Why Japan-China ties can benefit from promoting people-to-people exchanges

Akio Takahara

Akio Takahara is Distinguished Visiting Professor at Tokyo Woman’s Christian University.

30 April, 2026
Japan and China are Asian powerhouses that should collaborate responsibly for the peace and prosperity of the region. However, bilateral relations have experienced ups and downs since the start of the century and are now at their lowest point after normalisation in 1972. A major cause of this is the widening perception and information gap between the two nations that needs to be addressed through direct people-to-people contact.
 
Some, perhaps many, misunderstand that Japan and China are always quarrelling with each other. This is not the case. Most of the time, cooperation and exchange go on in the fields of business and economy, environment, entertainment, academia, sister city ties and so on, providing resilience in the bilateral relationship. An example is the advanced “green” fertiliser plant in Bangladesh that was jointly constructed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and China National Chemical Engineering and Construction Corporation Seven Ltd, and completed in November 2023.
 
This case signifies the compatibility of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific in collaborating on a good project, akin to two constellations sharing a bright star.
 
On the other hand, areas of vulnerability include security, territory, values, history and, most importantly, huge perception gaps between the Japanese and Chinese regarding how they view and interact with each other. There are various factors at play.
 
First, their political systems are so different that misunderstandings can easily occur. In 2012, for example, the Japanese government nationalised the Senkaku Islands, also known in China as the Diaoyu Islands. The government bought the islands from a private Japanese landlord to prevent the Tokyo metropolitan authorities from building a port and stationing their police force there. In short, the Japanese government made this move to avoid provoking China. Instead, it ended up angering Beijing, which could not understand why the Japanese central government couldn’t just stop the local Tokyo authorities from purchasing the islands. Apparently, some decision-makers in China were unaware that this was not possible under Japan’s political system, which grants local autonomy to the Tokyo government. This misunderstanding still lingers today.
 
Second, media reports sometimes mislead people out of political and/or commercial motives. One day after the collision between a Chinese fishing trawler and two Japanese coastguard vessels in 2010, Chinese official media published a drawing depicting big Japanese boats ramming into the belly of a small Chinese trawler. Later, the video recording of the collision taken by the Japanese side showed that it actually was the Chinese trawler that rammed into the coastguard boats.

In another case, when Chinese President Xi Jinping addressed a group of 3,000 Japanese visitors in 2015, some Japanese media reported the speech with the caption, “No tolerance for distortion of history, said Xi”. Overall, however, this speech was the friendliest speech given by a Chinese leader since the golden age of Japan-China relations in the 1980s.

Third, differences in culture, values or ways of thinking between Japan and China lead people to make wrong judgments about the other side by applying their own standards. When former prime minister Shinzo Abe visited the Yasukuni Shrine in 2013, many Chinese analysts argued that his purpose was to whip up nationalist sentiments and enhance the cohesiveness of the nation. However, all the public surveys conducted in Japan at that time indicated that the populace was completely divided over the visit. Abe’s decision to make the trip low-key suggested he knew his country was divided on the issue.

Public perceptions of each other are very important in bilateral relations. If they are negative, politicians are discouraged from making efforts to improve ties, while businesses can also be affected. Both sides must therefore attend to public sentiments lest they lose the support of the people. In recent years, public opinion of Japan-China relations has been rather negative in both countries. According to a joint survey conducted by the Japanese Genron NPO and the China International Publishing Group in October and November 2024, 89 per cent of Japanese respondents and 88 per cent of their Chinese counterparts did not have a good impression of the other side.

How do we improve public opinion if we cannot rely on mass and social media? One way is to reduce friction in the realms of security and politics. If this approach is difficult, another way is to fill the information gap through direct contact between the two peoples. People-to-people relations can be strengthened through mutual visits and face-to-face exchanges. The above-mentioned survey, conducted annually in both countries, strongly suggests that increased visits by Chinese tourists and businesspeople will help boost their perceptions of Japan.

Most people’s perceptions are formed by the information they have daily access to. Once they visit a country and gain new experiences, their views are bound to change. The Japan-China Friendship Centre organises mutual visits for hundreds of Chinese and Japanese youth each year. In almost all cases, their impressions change for the better. The most effective way to improve perceptions is through homestays, as the hosts and guests then communicate on a deeper emotional level.

To stabilise and improve Japan-China relations, I strongly hope the Chinese government will reopen the channels of communication that have been shut down in the past few months and resume people-to-people exchanges. To facilitate this process, I hope the Japanese government will elucidate its security policy and clarify the gist of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks in November that triggered China’s tough response. Today, almost all Japan-China exchanges have stopped, including those between top businesspeople, students, sister cities, and even friendship organisations. When Takaichi and Xi met last October in South Korea, they agreed on the importance of multilevel communication across a wide range of areas.

I hope both governments will implement this agreement because people-to-people relations are vitally important in closing the information gap, understanding the causes of differing perspectives, enabling heart-to-heart contact, and thus improving their perceptions of each other.

 


The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.

Latest

The Thailand-Cambodia conflict: A Thai and Cambodian perspective on peace
by In Sokhuon and Pattharapong Rattanasevee

The Busan silence: how great-power pragmatism is rewriting Taiwan’s future
by Robin Hu

ASEAN Between China and the US: Navigating a 'No Single Power' Global Order
by Lili Yan Ing

Breaking the Loop: Why India and China Need Political Imagination to Rebuild Trust and Relationship
by Tansen Sen 

Building Resilience for a New World
by Arunabha Ghosh

India, Pakistan, and Breaking out of the 'Continent of Circe'
by Akbar Ahmed

Southeast Asia's "Anatomy of Choice" Between the Great Powers
by Joseph Chinyong Liow & Yuen Foong Khong

Integrated Supply Chains - A Possible Citadel for Peace in Southeast Asia
by Cameron Johnson

How to Fix the Cracks in the Nuclear Dam
by Adam Thomson

Persuading for Peace, Protecting Its Interests: China’s Conflict Diplomacy
by Andrew Cainey and Chengkai Xie 

US ASEAN Policy Must Be Rooted in Economics, Not Just Defense
by Abhinav Seetharaman

South Korea: Is it time for a more balanced strategy?
by Soon Ok-Shin

A nuclear war started by AI sounds like sci-fiction. It isn’t
by Sundeep Waslekar

Ports, politics, and peace: The engineering of stability
by Guru Madhavan 

It's Time for Europe to Do the Unthinkable
Kishore Mahbubani

Can Young Americans and Chinese Build Bridges Over Troubled Waters?
Brian Wong

Trump 2:0: Getting US-China ties right despite the odds
Zhiqun Zhu

How Malaysia can boost Asean agency and centrality amid global challenges
Elina Noor

Why India-Pakistan relations need a new era of engagement
Farhan Hanif Siddiqi

Reconceptualizing Asia's Security Challenges
Jean Dong

Asia should take the Lead on Global Health
K. Srinath Reddy and Priya Balasubramaniam

Rabindranath Tagore: A Man for a New Asian Future
Archishman Raju

Securing China-US Relations within the Wider Asia-Pacific
Sourabh Gupta

Biden-Xi summit: A positive step in managing complex US-China ties
Chan Heng Chee

Singapore's Role as Neutral Interpreter of China to the West
Walter Woon

The US, China, and the Philippines in Between
Andrea Chloe Wong

Crisis Management in Asia: A Middle Power Imperative
Brendan Taylor

America can't stop China's rise
Tony Chan, Ben Harburg, and Kishore Mahbubani

Civilisational Futures and the Role of Southeast Asia
Tim Winter

US-China rivalry will be stern test for Vietnam's diplomatic juggle
Nguyen Cong Tung

Coexistence: The only realistic path to peace
Stephen M. Walt

Cyclone Mocha in conflict-ridden Myanmar is another warning to take climate security seriously
Sarang Shidore

Doubts about AUKUS
Hugh White

Averting the Grandest Collision of all time
Graham Allison

India Can Still Be a Bridge to the Global South
Sanjaya Baru

U.S.-China Trade and Investment Cooperation Amid Great Power Rivalry
Yuhan Zhang

Managing expectations: Indonesia navigating its international roles
Shafiah F. Muhibat

Caught in the middle? Not necessarily Non-alignment could help Southeast Asian regional integration
Xue Gong

It’s Dangerous Salami Slicing on the Taiwan Issue
Richard W. Hu

Navigating Troubled Waters: Ideas for managing tensions in the Taiwan Strait
Ryan Hass

The EU and ASEAN: Partners to Manage Great Power Rivalry?
Tan York Chor

Countering Moro Youth Extremism in the Philippines
Joseph Franco

India-China relations: Getting Beyond the Military Stalemate
C. Raja Mohan

America Needs an Economic Peace Strategy for Asia
Van Jackson

India-Pakistan: Peace by Pieces
Kanti Bajpai

HADR as a Diplomatic Tool in Southeast Asia-China Relations amid Changing Security Dynamics
Lina Gong

Technocratic Deliberation and Asian Peace
Parag Khanna

Safer Together: Why South and Southeast Asia Must Cooperate to Prevent a New Cold War in Asia
Sarang Shidore

Asia, say no to Nato: The Pacific has no need of the destructive militaristic culture of the Atlantic alliance
Kishore Mahbubani

Can Biden bring peace to Southeast Asia?
Dino Djalal

An India-Pakistan ceasefire that can stick
Ameya Kilara

An antidote against narrow nationalism? Why regional history matters
Farish A Noor

Can South Asia put India-Pakistan hostilities behind to unite for greater good?
Ramesh Thakur

Nuclear Deterrence 3.0
Rakesh Sood

The Biden era: challenges and opportunities for Southeast Asia
Michael Vatikiotis

Asian Peace Programme

About Us