Singapore’s Role as a Neutral Interpreter of China to the West

By Walter Woon
Walter Woon is Lee Kong Chian Visiting Professor at Singapore Management University as well as an honorary fellow at St John's College, Cambridge. He is an Emeritus Professor at the National University of Singapore and previously served as Singapore’s Attorney-General and Ambassador to the EU.

Republished in The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/singapores-role-as-a-neutral-interpreter-of-china-to-the-west/

And in Lianhe Zhaobao: https://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/views/story20231220-1457038

DECEMBER, 4, 2023

On February 15, 1898, the battleship USS Maine blew up in Havana harbor. At the time, Cuba was part of the Spanish Empire and tensions between Spain and the United States had been brewing for some time, principally over Cuba’s struggle for independence. There was no evidence that Spain was responsible for the destruction of the USS Maine; however, lack of evidence did not inhibit American newspapers in their competition for eyeballs. Sensationalized and biased reporting by the New York Journal and the New York World stoked the flames of wild nationalism, giving rise to the popular slogan “Remember the Maine.”

War followed. The United States took Cuba, the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam from Spain. The aftermath of the Maine incident is a cautionary tale of how biased and sensationalist reportage can lead to a breakdown in bilateral relations between states.

Western reportage of China has long suffered from an inherent bias against China. The Chinese government is perceived as an authoritarian, communist regime. These biases came to the fore in the accusations of “genocide” in Xinjiang, allegations of China’s unfair trade practices that necessitated U.S. trade tariffs, and most egregiously, the baseless theory that COVID-19 originated from a “lab leak” in Wuhan. If the growing West-China division is to be bridged, the Western world needs a more nuanced interpretation of China.

Singapore’s close relationship with both the West and China gives it a unique advantage as a more neutral interpreter of China for the Western world.

Singapore’s relationship with China is complex. The ancestors of most of Singapore’s population originated from China, principally the provinces of Fujian and Guangdong. These Chinese Singaporeans have a long history of aiding China against foreign aggression. Singapore-born philanthropist Cheang Hong Lim donated significant sums to the defense of Fuzhou against the French at the height of Western imperialism in the 19th century. After the Japanese invasion of China in 1937, Tan Kah Kee chaired the China Relief Fund, which raised money to defend China against the Japanese. During World War II, resistance hero Lim Bo Seng parachuted into occupied Malaya as part of Force 136. He was caught and executed; the Nationalist government of China posthumously awarded him the rank of major general. Xian Xinghai composed “Defend the Yellow River” at the height of the Sino-Japanese War. He was educated at Yeung Ching School (now Yangzheng Primary School) in Singapore. The song is still taught to schoolchildren in China and was played by Lang Lang at the opening of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

However, this history does not mean Singapore instinctively aligns with China. Indeed, China supported communist insurrections in Singapore and Malaya from the 1950s up to the 1970s. As a result, groups perceived to be supported by the Chinese Communist Party were viewed with suspicion and hostility by the People’s Action Party (PAP)-led Singapore government. During this period, and especially after Singapore’s separation from Malaysia in 1965, Singapore relied on the West, particularly Britain and the United States, for its military security and economic growth. Relations between Singapore and China eventually normalized when China opened up in the late 1970s and stopped supporting communist movements in the region.

Singapore’s perspective of China is primarily informed by its need to balance its relationship with both the China and the West. As a result, Singapore’s reportage of China does not suffer from the biases of seeing China as a competitor or an ally.

Lianhe Zaobao, Singapore’s largest Chinese language newspaper, has Chinese-speaking correspondents based in different parts of China as well as in Taipei and Hong Kong. By featuring commentaries in both Chinese and English from various parts of China – but also from Hong Kong and Taiwan – Zaobao provides a diversity of perspectives on China. Zaobao’s reporting has been criticized from both the West and China – a testament to its relative neutrality. In July 2023, the Washington Post ran a story accusing Zaobao of echoing Chinese propaganda. Chinese media commentators, on the other hand, have accused Zaobao of “learning from American teachers and teaching China how to do things.” Likewise, Singapore’s public intellectuals do not necessarily hew to the received (Western) interpretation of the Chinese threat prevalent in the United States and its allies.

Notwithstanding Singapore’s growing relations with China, Singapore continues to retain close, albeit unofficial, relations with Taiwan. Singapore could therefore play a constructive role in managing relations across the Taiwan Strait. If there is to be rapprochement between China and Taiwan, Singapore is an ideal place to start the negotiations.

Singapore already acts as a neutral venue for meetings of officials and politicians on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. A notable instance was the meeting between then-Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou and Chinese President Xi Jinping on November 7, 2015. Singapore can serve as a neutral venue for meetings and negotiations among officials from China, Taiwan, and the United States. The polemical rhetoric that accompanies any discussion on Taiwan in the U.S., as seen during then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s ill-conceived visit to Taipei, would be absent in Singapore.

The dangers of passive neutrality by small powers during great power competition are exemplified by the fate of Melos during the Peloponnesian War. Melos’ refusal to give up its neutrality in favor of Athens led to a general massacre of its population, following a siege by the Athenian army. There is no real danger of Singapore suffering the fate of Melos. One hopes that saner politicians and military men on all sides will not push matters over the brink. However, small states that are caught in the crosshairs of great power competition continue to remain vulnerable to trade embargos, cyber attacks, and threats from non-state actors.

Singapore wants good relations with both China and the United States. Singapore can quietly offer private and confidential advice to both sides to enhance mutual understanding between these two powers, without public grandstanding. At the same time, Singaporeans should not be afraid to speak out in order to counter dangerous ignorance and rising anti-Asian prejudice in Western societies.

A neutral, nuanced voice, like that of Singapore, could help to reduce tensions between the United States and China. In law there is a wise maxim: audi alterem partem, hear the other side. In the great echoing caverns of the Western media and public intellectual space, such a nuanced voice is vital. Singapore is well-placed to provide that neutral voice, privately and publicly.

 


The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.

Latest

The US, China, and the Philippines in Between
Andrea Chloe Wong

Crisis Management in Asia: A Middle Power Imperative
Brendan Taylor

America can't stop China's rise
Tony Chan, Ben Harburg, and Kishore Mahbubani

Civilisational Futures and the Role of Southeast Asia
Tim Winter

US-China rivalry will be stern test for Vietnam's diplomatic juggle
Nguyen Cong Tung

Coexistence: The only realistic path to peace
Stephen M. Walt

Cyclone Mocha in conflict-ridden Myanmar is another warning to take climate security seriously
Sarang Shidore

Doubts about AUKUS
Hugh White

Averting the Grandest Collision of all time
Graham Allison

India Can Still Be a Bridge to the Global South
Sanjaya Baru

U.S.-China Trade and Investment Cooperation Amid Great Power Rivalry
Yuhan Zhang

Managing expectations: Indonesia navigating its international roles
Shafiah F. Muhibat

Caught in the middle? Not necessarily Non-alignment could help Southeast Asian regional integration
Xue Gong

It’s Dangerous Salami Slicing on the Taiwan Issue
Richard W. Hu

Navigating Troubled Waters: Ideas for managing tensions in the Taiwan Strait
Ryan Hass

The EU and ASEAN: Partners to Manage Great Power Rivalry?
Tan York Chor

Countering Moro Youth Extremism in the Philippines
Joseph Franco

India-China relations: Getting Beyond the Military Stalemate
C. Raja Mohan

America Needs an Economic Peace Strategy for Asia
Van Jackson

India-Pakistan: Peace by Pieces
Kanti Bajpai

HADR as a Diplomatic Tool in Southeast Asia-China Relations amid Changing Security Dynamics
Lina Gong

Technocratic Deliberation and Asian Peace
Parag Khanna

Safer Together: Why South and Southeast Asia Must Cooperate to Prevent a New Cold War in Asia
Sarang Shidore

Asia, say no to Nato: The Pacific has no need of the destructive militaristic culture of the Atlantic alliance
Kishore Mahbubani

Can Biden bring peace to Southeast Asia?
Dino Djalal

An India-Pakistan ceasefire that can stick
Ameya Kilara

An antidote against narrow nationalism? Why regional history matters
Farish A Noor

Can South Asia put India-Pakistan hostilities behind to unite for greater good?
Ramesh Thakur

Nuclear Deterrence 3.0
Rakesh Sood

The Biden era: challenges and opportunities for Southeast Asia
Michael Vatikiotis

Asian Peace Programme

About Us